(Stamp) SECRET
(Stamp) Declassified)

On the Activities of the Communist Party of India (1947)

CPSU (b)

This Soviet document on the activities of the CPI comes from the Suslov holding in the RGANI, Moscow. It does not carry the author s name nor indeed the day or month it was prepared in 1947. In the post-independence period such analyses were prepared by V. Grigorian on behalf of the Foreign Policy Commission of the CC of the CPSU (b) and presented to the Politburo of the party. A number of these presentations have already been published in this journal. They are important as they successively evaluate the situation of the Indian communist party. In terms of dating this document the Suslov file begins from 18th August 1946 and ends on 28th February 1948. The documents after the one below are followed by the invitation dated 27 December 1947 by P.C. Joshi, General Secretary of the CPI, to the CPSU (b) to the Second Congress of the party to be held in Calcutta in February 1948 and then the draft greetings prepared by Suslov on behalf of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b). This presentation is of interest in general terms as it analyses the situation in India and the role of the CPI just after the transfer of power. Particularly it evaluates the politics of the P.C. Joshi leadership pointing to its illusions about the British Labour Party in the transfer of power. On the question of Pakistan it is suggested that the CPI dropped its support for the reactionary slogan of Pakistan in 1945 under the impact of the CPGB rather than in early 1946 when R.P. Dutt visited India. The CPI it is said here correctly pointed out the role of imperialism in dividing India but did not understand that the Muslim masses supported the Pakistan slogan as consequence of the chauvinism of the reactionary sections of the Hindu bourgeoisie.

Vijay Singh

The Communist Party of India was founded in 1933. Until 1942, it was working underground. In September 1942, the first legal, extended Plenum of the Central Committee was convened in Bombay. By this time, the party had 9 thousand members, more than 4 thousand candidates and about 9 thousand people sympathizing and helping the party, but not having formalized their membership. In May 1943, the first Congress of the party was held in Bombay, which approved the Charter of the party and elected the Central Committee, which included: Pooran Chand Joshi, Balchand Tribak Ranadive, Gangadhar Adhikari, P. Sundaraiyya, E.M.S. Namboodripad, N.K. Krishnan, D.S. Wadia, Bhowani Sen, Ronen Sen, D.S. Sardesai, Iqbal Singh, Mohan Kumara Mangalam, Mohammed Ashraf, Zaheer Sajjad, Somnath Lahiri and Dange, Shripat Amrit. The first three were selected into the Politbureau, P. Chand Joshi was elected as Secretary General.

By the time of the first Congress of the party its ranks grew up to 16 thousand members, it currently has 70 thousand members. The Communist Party is preparing to convene the Second Congress of the party in October this year, which will discuss the most important issues of policy and tactics of the party in connection with the division of India into two dominions and the creation of Indian governments in Hindustan and Pakistan. Despite the fact that the Communist Party of India was in an illegal situation and worked in difficult conditions, it achieved significant success in the first years of its work. Communist groups and cells were established in all the major provinces and gradually gained influence among workers and peasants.

Party members participated in the work of trade unions, exposed the reformist tendencies of trade union leaders. The Communist Party fought for the unification of workers’ organizations, created circles of political education, published newspapers and magazines, led many strikes, took an active part in the Indian national liberation movement, expanding its influence among the workers and peasants of India. The first major success in the work of the Communist Party should be considered the organization and holding of a General Strike of textile workers in 1934. More than 120,000 workers participated in this strike. It played a significant role in the growth of the organization of the working masses, in their awareness of their class interests. The Communist Party also had a great influence on the growth of the strike and national liberation movement of the working class on the eve of the Second World War. In 1939 in India there were 406 strikes, which covered more than 410 thousand people. A large strike broke out among the workers of the oil fields of a large British company. The strike lasted about 8 months. Large strikes also took place among tea plantation workers. Mass rallies and demonstrations demanding India’s national independence were held everywhere in towns and villages, and the Communist Party was in the forefront everywhere. In 1939, the movement for the legalization of the Communist Party became widespread. In some of the largest industrial cities of India, in Bombay, Calcutta, Madras, Cawnpore etc. there were numerous meetings of workers, which adopted resolutions on the lifting of the ban on the Communist Party,

Similar demands were also made at peasant meetings in the villages.

In September 1939, when India was declared a belligerent, the Communist Party of India, as well as the National Congress, supported the universal demand for India’s independence. Believing that war between Germany and England was imperialist, it refused to lend support to either side. This position it held prior to the German attack on the Soviet Union. The treacherous attack of Nazi Germany on the Soviet Union in June 1941 caused a huge wave of indignation in India. Rallies were held throughout the country, expressing sympathy for the Soviet Union and solidarity in the fight against fascism. Progressive Indian organizations realized that it was no longer a struggle between imperialist States – Germany and England – but that a decisive battle had begun between fascism on the one hand and the forces of democracy on the other, and that in this struggle it was no longer possible to remain neutral. The Communist Party called on the Indian people to give full support to the Soviet Union. It launched a wide campaign to raise funds for the USSR aid Fund and organized lectures and reports on the life of the Soviet people.

In early 1942, the Communist Party of India appealed to the British government with a proposal: to release the arrested Communists, to remove the ban from the Communist Party, to allow it to work legally, and then all party members, the whole party as a whole will direct all their efforts and energy to the defence of the country. The British government accepted the proposal, and in mid-July 1942 the Communist Party of India was legalized. The threat of Japanese invasion by that time hung directly over India.

The Communist Party believed that if the Indian people were directly opposed to defensive measures, they could get Japanese fascism instead of British imperialism. Member of the Central Committee of the CPI S. S. Zaheer in mid-July 1942, placed in the newspaper “Bombay Chronicle” the following statement: “The Communists believe that our homeland is in serious danger. We are facing the threat of a Japanese invasion. Communists exert all their energy and all means to awaken the people and realize their Patriotic duty – to defend their Homeland. This is our country, and we have a duty to protect it. We must take the initiative to defend the Motherland into our own hands. We are fighting for national unity, for national government and national resistance to fascist invaders. Of course, we do not accept any assistance from the government if we consider it to be directed indirectly or directly against our policies and principles. Our line now is strong resistance to the Japanese, no matter what the government does. For example, if it decides to leave this country, just as it did with Burma, we will continue to fight the fascist aggressors. This is briefly our policy, which we are going to explain in our newspapers.”

On September 19, 1942 in the city of Bombay for the first time in legal conditions an extended Plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist party of India has gathered. Years underground have not broken the Communist party. Despite the most severe persecution and repression, which had to move the Communist Party into the underground, it managed to keep and strengthen its fighting core. The party regularly published its printed organ, the weekly “People’s War”, published in 4 languages, English, Urdu, Hindi and Marathi, with a total circulation of 15 thousand copies.

The first issue of the weekly “People’s War” was released on July 5, 1942, that is, in fact, before the lifting of the ban from the Communist Party. The main political report at the plenary session was made by a member of the CC CPI comrade Adhikari and supplementary report – by the General Secretary P. C. Joshi. Based on the statements of these leaders, the plenary assessed the situation in India and outlined the prospects for its work. According to the Plenum, the responsibility for the situation in the country lay with the English government, which by the arrests of members of the National Congress has provoked riots. The plenary confirmed that the Congress’s demands for recognition of India’s independence and the establishment of an interim national government capable of mobilizing the Indian people to protect India in Alliance with the United Nations were national demands. The Plenum condemned the British policy of repression against the National Congress and the Indian people and called for a broad political awareness-raising campaign to distract Indian patriots from the suicidal tactics of sabotage and undermining the country’s military efforts. The Plenum called for the mobilization of the country’s forces to fight against the fascist aggressors. The resolution emphasized the need for unity between the National Congress and the Muslim League.

Working to unite the masses against the aggressors and supporting England in its struggle against Hitler’s Germany and imperialist Japan, the Communist Party simultaneously fought for the creation of a national government in India. The Party Committee in Delhi (the capital of India) collected 10 thousand signatures under the Memorandum and presented it to the government. In this document it was said that India should have a national government, because only it will be able to mobilize the population to fight the enemy, to raise the patriotic spirit of the population, to mobilize the resources of the country and to make every effort for a successful resistance to the aggressors.

The Punjabi Provincial Committee of the Indian CP, led by Sohan Singh Josh, demanded recognition of India’s rights to establish a national government, to self-determination of all nationalities and to form an equal Alliance with the United Nations fighting against fascist aggressors.

The campaign for the unity of democratic forces launched throughout the country by the Communist Party, and the struggle against repression carried out by order of the government, were hostile to the British authorities in India. When the Communist Party, both in the press and at rallies, openly accused the government of carrying out cruel repressions against the Indian people and called on the people for unity of action, the government began to pursue an increasingly hostile policy against it.

Arrests of Communists under all sorts of pretexts were frequent. The extreme imperialist elements began to demand that the party be outlawed again. However, despite the repression, the Communist party continued to work among the masses and its selfless work has achieved great success.

From May 23 to June 1 1943, the first Congress of the Communist Party of India was held in Bombay. The Congress was attended by 139 delegates representing 16,000 party members. Speaking at the Congress, Secretary General of the CP of India Joshi stressed the imperative need to create unity of all Indian people. The Congress adopted a new Charter of the party, developed taking into account the legal conditions of the party. After the Congress, during 1943-1944, and later the Communist Party, with it all other progressive forces of the country, tirelessly demanded from the government the release of the leaders of the National Congress, the agreement of the Congress with the Muslim League and the creation on this basis, of a national government with the participation of representatives of other political parties and organizations. The Indian Communist Party stressed that the establishment of an Indian national government could not be carried out without an agreement between the two largest organizations, the National Congress and the Muslim League.

In connection with the Communist Party’s line of support for England in its military efforts to protect India from German fascism and Japanese imperialism, the leaders of the National Congress, who were released in mid-1945 from prison, took a hostile position against the Communist Party, accusing it of “treason” and choosing to be on the side of the British. They removed Communist Party members from leadership positions in the National Congress. The London “Weekly World News and Views” on November 17, 1945 published an article in which it said “On release from prison in June 1945, the leader of the Congress Nehru addressed the press with a statement in which he accused the Communist Party of India in the transition to the side of British imperialism. Nehru accused it of not leading and launching the “struggle” that began in August 1942 in protest against the arrest of congressional leaders. But Nehru forgets that this “struggle” led to a very wide spread of acts of sabotage and unrest at a time when the Japanese army was on the border of India. In the critical years (1942-1944), the Communist Party of India adhered to the line that India, although in shackles, should participate in the fight against fascism and unite its fight with the struggle of the United Nations. But at the same time, the Indian Communists strongly demanded the release of Congress leaders, exposed corruption and mediocrity of the bureaucracy and demanded the formation of an interim national government, which alone would be able to mobilize India for the successful conduct of the war.”

Leaders of Congress now accuse the Communist Party that it allegedly betrayed the “movement”. The main argument of the anti-Communist campaign of the right-wing congressmen is the accusation of the Communists that during the Second World War they called to fight against the axis powers together with England, which, according to the Congress members, was a betrayal of the national cause of India. The signal for the elimination of the Communists from the ranks of the Congress was picked up by Pro-Congress newspapers and led to the fact that on September 6, 1945, 20 members of the Communist party, including several women, were beaten in different parts of the city of Bombay, simply because they sold the annex to the newspaper “Peoples' War”. On September 7, 1945, the Bombay Committee of Congress expelled four Communists. Explaining the reasons for the expelling, the Secretary of the Committee said: “The Communists constantly resisted almost every official measure of the Congress. They don’t believe in non-violence. They encourage a sense of distrust among workers towards the Indian National Congress. We must purge our great organization of all undesirable elements that obstruct it. “

The campaign against the Communists and the creation of unbearable conditions for them led to the fact that the Communists themselves began to withdraw from the ranks of Congress. In early October 1945, Indian newspapers published a statement by P. C. Joshi. “We, the Indian Communists,” the statement said, “had high hopes that the leadership of the Congress – our most advanced organization – would take the initiative to think about uniting the entire country to maintain a democratic plan for the immediate liberation of India in alliance with the victorious progressive forces of the world. But the leadership of the Congress after their release did not undertake any serious steps, but only shows their group arrogance. Instead of presenting a concrete plan to achieve freedom for India, they proposed to the congressional organization such a course of action (the exclusion of Communists – Ed.), which will further divide the forces of liberation." Recalling his work in support of Congress, Joshi said, “The Leadership is raising its hand against our young party, which for the past 3 years has consistently defended it against imperialist opponents, both domestically and abroad. The leaders of the Congress put forward against us the arguments of the world’s worst reactionaries that our anti-fascism and our opposition against sabotage in the defence of our country was an effort to help Britain”.

At a meeting of the Congress Working Committee in early December 1945, it was decided to exclude Communists from both the Executive Committee of the National Congress and the provincial committees. But even after that, the Communist Party of India confirmed that it will continue to fight for the unification of all the Indian people and primarily for the agreement between the Congress with the Muslim League.

Palme Dutt in the journal Labour Monthly for March 1946 reveals the true cause of the persecution by the leadership of Congress against the Communist Party of India. He writes, “The added difficulty (of solving the problem) arises from the growing discord between the National Congress and the Communist Party, which is a reflection of the escalating class contradictions at this stage of India’s development. The Communist Party is the undisputed leader of the working class and organized peasant movement in India. It now has 30,000 members, being the third political party in India and the only party effectively uniting Hindus and Muslims On the other hand, the major Indian capitalists have strengthened their position and amassed large profits from the war. With the weakening of British imperialism, the Indian major capitalists see the post-war phase as an excellent opportunity to break free from the noose of British monopoly, to gain the main positions and to embark on the path of broad profitable industrial development of the country under the control of the national government. These new developments have further strengthened the influence of the largest and most firmly seated Indian capitalists on the leadership of the Congress, which has become the organ of the rising capitalist class of India, although in the modern period it still has a broad support of the masses. This growing influence of the large Indian capitalists in the leadership of the Congress is reflected in an increasing conquest of the dominance of right-wing leadership (Patel, Prasad, Kripalani etc.) and this right-wing offensive against the Communists. Previously, these elements tolerated the presence of Communists in the national movement, using them as a weapon of pressure on the government. Now that the possibility of gaining government power is approaching, these elements are watching with hostility the growth of the Communist party, its development into a mass party, and the expansion of the number of workers‘ and peasants’ organizations under its influence.”

As a result of anti-Communist activities and propaganda of the right elements of the leadership of the Congress, the influence of the Communist Party on the urban strata of the petty bourgeoisie and the peasantry was weakened. However, Congress failed to weaken the influence of the Communist Party on the working class of India. The indefatigable work of the Indian Communists to unite all national forces in the struggle for the independence of the country, the leadership of the unprecedented rise of the strike movement, which covered not only the workers but also other labouring strata, the skilful combination of national demands with the daily demands of the masses – all this contributed to the growth of the party’s authority and the strengthening of its influence among the workers.

The influence of the Communist Party of India in the trade unions was especially increased. Most Indian trade unions are adjacent to the trade union centre, which is under the ideological and organizational influence of the Indian Communist Party. India’s largest and most advanced trade union organization is the All India Trade Union Congress. This trade union center, founded in 1920, currently has 730 thousand members, being the most reputable workers' organization in the country.

It unites the Union of Bengal sailors with 34,823 members, the Bombay Union of textile workers “Girni Kamgar” – 20,000 people, the Union of Miners in Bihar – 5 thousand, the All-India Association of railway workers, numbering 80 thousand members of trade union and a number of others. The all-India Congress of Trade Unions consists of about 600 unions, more than half of which joined between 1943 and 1947. Under its influence there are up to 4 million workers. The General Council – the body that directs the work between sessions and consists of 104 people – includes 55 Communists. Dange, a Communist and a member of the Central Committee of the Indian Communist party, was elected Chairman of the Congress. The programme of the All India Congress of Trade Unions includes the following items:

1. Improving the economic and political situation of the Indian working class, 8-hour working day, equal pay for equal work, unemployment benefit, sickness, injury benefits, abolition of fines, prohibition of work of children under 15 years.

2. Freedom of speech, press, association and assembly, the right to work and rest.

3. The abolition of economic and political privileges based on the principle of castes, political beliefs and religious world views.

4. Coordination of the activities of the workers ‘ unions of the All-India Congress of Trade Unions, the elimination of the system of recruitment of workers and the establishment of a single system of recruitment, only through trade unions.

One of the main points of the programme states that the ultimate goal of the All-India Congress of Trade Unions is the establishment of a socialist state in India and the nationalization of the means of production. In February 1947, a session of the All India Trade Union Congress was held in Calcutta. This session was the most numerously attended in the history of the Congress. It was attended by 1,100 delegates from various provinces of British India and Indian principalities. There were many delegates who secretly came from the Indian principalities and provinces, where they were wanted by the police to be arrested for leading strikes.

At the session, the Congress of trade unions reaffirmed its commitment to socialism and declared that the main goal of the working class movement of India is the formation of a socialist state in which all power will belong to the workers and industry will be fully nationalized.

The rise of the labour movement in India in the post-war years reached unprecedented proportions. In 1945, there were 848 strikes with the participation of 782 thousand workers. F or the 9 months of 1946 there were 1466 strikes, in which participated 1737 thousands of workers. During the strikes, 8962 thousand working days were lost. There is no industry in which there were no strikes. Government employees, communications workers, workers of the Indian principalities, agricultural workers were on strike. A characteristic feature of the strike movement of these years – mass strikes, staunch resistance and class solidarity of workers. At the same time, the strike movement was usually organized and directed by the Trade Union Congress, led by the Indian Communist party, what caused even greater hatred of both the Communist Party and the Trade Union Congress by the British imperialists and Indian capitalists.

Powerless to defeat the Trade Union Congress, they used the tactics of splitting its ranks, trying to create parallel unions and unions built on religious grounds. Such organizations include the All-India Labour Federation, which has about 300,000 members. It was formed in November 1941 by an agent of British imperialism, the Trotskyist Roy, who is at the same time the leader of the “Radical Democratic Party”. Another parallel trade union centre is the Workers‘ Union of India (Hindustan Mazdur Sevak Sangh), created by the right wing of the Indian National Congress. The leaders of this organization openly declare that their goal is to “protect” the working masses from the Communists, who allegedly “filled” the Trade Union Congress. This organization has about 200 thousand members. However, this professional centre is not popular with workers. Right-wing Congress members understand that with the help of this union they will not be able to break off any significant masses of workers from the All- India Trade Union Congress. Currently, the Hindustan Mazdur Sevak Sangh and the right wing of the National Congress led by Patel have taken the initiative to create a new trade union centre, which should become an all-India organization under the ideological and organizational influence of the All-India National Congress.

The Hindustan Mazdur Sevak Sangh session, chaired by the leader of the right wing of the National Congress, Patel, decided to call the new union “Indian National Trade Union Congress". The resolution states that the new organization should “pull workers out of the influence of various parties that use trade unions for their political purposes”. At the official opening of the new trade union centre on May 4, 1947, Patel quite openly admitted that this organization aims primarily to combat Communist influence among the workers of India. He stated that the All-India Trade Union Congress was in the hands of Communists organizing strikes for political purposes.

The creation of the Indian National Trade Unions Congress threatens to split the Indian labour movement, as it seems that all the forces of the Indian National Congress will be thrown into the fight against the All-India Trade Union Congress.

Organizing and leading the peasant movement in the post-war years, the party was able to strengthen and expand its base in the villages. Currently, in many provinces in the governing bodies of peasant organizations are the Communists. The Communist Party sent a number of specially trained workers to work in the peasant unions. The Communist Party is also deploying work among the peoples of the principalities. In 1936, with the direct participation of the Communist Party of India, the all- Indian peasant Union “Kisan Sabha” was created. It originated in the growth process, the spontaneous peasant uprisings against the British and Indian landlords. At the Third Congress of the Union, in May 1938, the programme of the organization was adopted, which included the struggle against the domination of English imperialism in India and Indian landlords, against the high rent, forced labour for the benefit of landowners, illegal levies and taxes, etc. The number of members of the “Kisan Sabha” by that time reached 550 thousand people.

The Fourth Congress of Kisan Sabha, held in April 1939, adopted a resolution stating that the logical end of the daily peasant struggle should be the eradication of English imperialism and the agrarian revolution, because only in this way the peasants will be able to obtain land, to eliminate all the exploiters standing between the peasants and the state and thus free the peasants from the burden of taxes and debts and ensure their full use of the fruits of their labour. The resolution ends with the words:

“The peasant organization believes that now is the time to achieve full national independence of the country and the creation of a democratic state of the Indian people with the ultimate goal of implementing the idea of “Kisan Mazdur Raj” (the state of peasants and workers – Ed.)". Kisan Sabha led to its ranks a large number of members of the National Congress and active Muslim leaders. It is considered a mass non-party organization. The Committee of the Kisan Sabha, which met after the Plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of India, held in September 1942, on the basis of its decisions adopted the following resolution on the political situation in the country:

"1. To demand the release of Congress leaders and to counter the government’s attempts to create an anti-Communist or anti-national bloc.

2. In every village and locality, to lead a broad campaign of unity between Hindus and Muslims, between different castes and strata of the people, in order to achieve unification between the Congress and the Muslim League and on its basis to create unity of all the Indian people.

3. To restore peace and order in the villages, to isolate saboteurs and provocateurs, to fight for the restoration of civil liberties and the abolition of collective fines.

4. To demand resolution of the problem of peasant debt and rent."

Currently, the number of members of Kisan Sabha is about one million people. The Chairman of the General Council of the All-India Peasant Union is a prominent figure of the Communist Party, B. Mukherjee; at the head of the Bengal provincial peasant union is also a Communist, Muzaffar Ahmed. In connection with the new manoeuvres of British imperialism in India, which ultimately led to the division of India into two States – India and Pakistan, the Communist party not only exposed to the masses the true intentions of the imperialists and the compromising tendencies of the reactionary wing of the Indian bourgeoisie from the leadership of the National Congress and the Muslim League, but also put forward its own programme of struggle for genuine national independence.

The Communist Party explained to the masses of India that behind the dismemberment of India lies the desire of the British imperialists to maintain their dominance over the weak divided States by economic assistance to them, assistance in the organization of government. The Communist Party pointed out that under the guise of protecting these weak states from external danger, the British imperialists are hatching plans for a military alliance with the Indian States and their inclusion in the projected Anglo- American bloc of the Union of States of the Middle East, directed against the USSR.

Opposing the creation of new states on religious grounds, the Communist Party demanded that all national groups in India should be recognized in their rights to national self-determination and that a single, free, democratic state should be created on a Federal basis, in which the rights of each national group would be protected by the Constitution.

Warning about the possibility of collusion of the British imperialists with reactionary circles of the Indian bourgeoisie against the people and the use by the British of their social supportive forces within India – feudal lords, landlords and moneylenders – the Communist Party shows the people the way to undermine the economic basis of British rule. The Communist Party put forward three basic requirements: the withdrawal of all British troops, the nationalization of all British enterprises in India, the elimination of landowner ownership.

Given that in connection with the formal transfer of power to the Indian bourgeoisie, the latter removes the slogan of the struggle for national independence and prepares for the defeat of the liberation forces in the country, the Communist party directs the masses to continue the struggle for genuine independence. To this end, the Communist party has developed a programme of democratic and economic transformation. This programme was introduced on behalf of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of India in the Constituent Assembly at the first session by the Communist member of the Constituent Assembly, S. Lahiri.

Further development of the proposals of the Communist Party on issues related to the “transfer” of power by the British to the governments of the Indian States, the definition of the form of new States, their foreign and domestic policy, are in the documents prepared in May 1947 by the Secretary General of the Central Committee of the Indian Communist Party – P. C. Joshi in the form of an “Appeal to the People of India” and a member of the Politburo B. T. Ranadive entitled “Draft Memorandum to the Provisional Government on Communist and working policy”. Both these documents were prepared for the Plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, held in May 1947 (documents are attached).

During the Second World War and in the post war years, the Indian Communist Party has grown significantly in quantitative terms, has strengthened its influence on the masses, especially on the working class, but has not yet taken its place as the leader of the national liberation struggle of the Indian people.

The Communist Party has gained considerable experience in organizing and leading the movement of the masses, in general, correctly defined the tactical tasks of the party in accordance with the changed situation in the country. However, on some issues the Communist Party admitted its uncertainty and mistakes. At the beginning the Communist party voiced their support for the demands of the Muslim League about Pakistan, and in 1945, under the influence of the attitudes of the British Communist Party, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of India changed its point of view. Announcing the idea of creating Pakistan to be reactionary, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of India did not understand the true reasons for the support of this idea by the Muslim masses who sought to get rid of the great chauvinist attitude towards them from the reactionary elements of the Hindu bourgeoisie.

Failing to draw the lines of division between the aspirations of the reactionary elements of the leadership of the Muslim League and the Muslim masses, the Central Committee of the CP of India could not give the right slogan to the Muslim masses and this caused them to distrust the Communist Party, which gave rise to the Muslim masses to consider the Indian Communist Party to be a supporter of the interests of the Hindu majority in the country.

Having correctly opposed the Communist Party of Pakistan, organized by Teja Singh Swatantra, previously expelled from the Communist Party of India for divisive activities, the Central Committee makes the mistake of insisting on the preservation now, when the division of India into two dominions has become a fact, of a single organization of the Communist Party, trade unions and peasant unions for both dominions – Hindustan and Pakistan. Such a decision of the Communist Party of India could lead to the self-isolation of the Communist Party, especially in the dominion of Pakistan.

Criticizing from the right positions and exposing the manoeuvres of British imperialism in India, the leadership of the Communist Party falls into error, separating the policy of the British Labour government from the general political line of the British imperialists on the colonial question. The draft proclamation of the Communist Party to the peoples of India states: “the British labour movement, to which the Labour government was responsible, no longer intends to return to the old conservative policy against India, and honestly advocated India’s cooperation on the basis of Indian independence.”

The re-evaluation of Labour gives rise to illusions among the leadership of the Communist Party regarding the genuine transfer of power to India and the possibility of establishing cooperation between India and England to the equal benefit of both parties. In the same document, the Communist Party of India proposes: “close and growing economic cooperation between India and England, established between our national government and the British Labour government, is in the common interest... The struggle against Indian poverty and for English socialism must be united on the basis of the economic treaty signed in June 1948.”

The leaders of the Indian Communist party misjudge the forces of British imperialism, exaggerating its weakness and underestimating its ability to manoeuvre. The draft proclamation to the people says: "History began to squeeze the throat of the British Empire with its bony hand from all sides. First, the British economy is in danger of collapse. With an economic Dunkirk at home, it was impossible to cope with the Indian revolt. Secondly, there were not enough soldiers in England who would agree to strangle the determined struggle of the Indian people and to remain as sentries in India... Third, the whole mechanism of imperialist domination created to govern India was in a state of collapse.”

Declaring the possibility of collusion of the British imperialists with the Indian reaction, the presence of reactionary elements in the leadership of the National Congress, the leaders of the Indian Communist Party still often stray to the path of unconditional support for the National Congress, without exposing on specific examples to the people the fact that the reactionary wing of the Indian bourgeoisie and its representatives in the leadership of the National Congress conducts an anti-national policy in their narrow class interests.

The leadership of the Indian Communist party continuously maintains contact with the Communist Party of England and receives support from it. The English Communist party responds to all major political events in India, reveals the manoeuvres of the British imperialists, aimed at preserving the colonial situation in India. However, in practice, the leadership of the English Communist party does not always correctly orient the Indian Communists. This was the case with regard to the establishment of Pakistan, as well as the prospects for the development of the national liberation movement in colonial countries in the post-war period.

The leading comrades of the British Communist party, on the basis of the incorrect assumption that the coalition of great democratic powers, united during the war, guarantees a democratic resolution of the colonial question in the post-war period, did not advise the Indian Communists to orient the Indian masses to the expansion of the national liberation struggle in India.

The Communist Party of India is aware of its weakness and understands the difficulties it faces in the new environment in India. In this regard, it insists on regular communication with the AUCP (b) in order to use the advice of the fraternal party on the most complex political issues. The political line and practical activities of the Communist Party of India during the underground, war and post-war period, its close relationship with the masses and, above all, with the working class, is evidence that, despite some weaknesses and mistakes, it is the combat vanguard of the Indian proletariat, able to rally around it the broad masses of the city and village and lead the national liberation struggle of the Indian people for the conquest of genuine national independence.

RGANI Fond 8. Opis 1. D. 294. P. 283. LL. 62-79.

Translated from the Russian by Irina Malenko.


Click here to return to the October 2019 index.